NBA 2015 Playoffs Thread

popsicledeath

Potato del Grande
7,547
11,831
We Gonna Be Championship
I'm gonna let you finish, but Lebron had the best stats of the series! Lebron lost it, Warrirors didn't win it. Just look at the stats! Lebron is MVP and the championship is actually his because he lost so spectacularly that if the warriors had any respect they'd forfeit the championship!
 

Daezuel

Potato del Grande
23,335
49,857
FINALS MVP WAS A 2-MAN RACE
Per NBA PR, the Finals MVP vote was Andre Iguodala (7) against LeBron James (4). Stephen Curry got no votes.

rrr_img_100388.jpg
 

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,387
15,530
Post Season; a shot to tie or take the lead

Last 24 seconds

Kobe: 7 for 28 (25.0%)

LeBron: 7 for 17 (41.1%)

Last 30 seconds

Kobe: 7 for 28 (25.0%) (0 for 8 from the 09 post season till present day)

LeBron: 9 for 19 (47.30%)

Last 2 minutes

Kobe: 17 for 50 (34%) (0 for 8 in the last two playoffs; 2010 and 2011)

LeBron: 21 for 43 (48.8%)

Last 5 minutes

Kobe (since 01 season): 30 for 88 (34.09%)

LeBron: (since 06 season): 36 for 74 (48.6%)

Playoff Games

Game 7 of a Playoff Series

Kobe 22.2ppg on 38.9% FG with 8.0rpg and 5.0apg (6 games)

LeBron *34.0ppg on 46.5% FG with 8.1rpg and 3.5 APG (4 games) (*NBA Record)

Elimination Games

Kobe 21.5 ppg on 41.4% FG with 5.8rpg and 3.5apg (19 games)

LeBron 31.5 ppg on 46% FG with 10.0rpg and 6.5apg (12 games)
Still waiting on anything to back up the idea that Kobe is clutch. I used to think that until I saw the numbers and I don't know how else you could measure it if not by numbers. If you don't believe in any quantifiable way to measure it or that all the numbers from that link don't matter then, yeah, I guess it is all about feels.

You can point out Lebron played against a weaker conference for many of those playoff games but that still doesn't mean Kobe's numbers aren't pretty poor. I'm sure there's some way to quantify that, as well, but that's just another number and not a feeling.

I don't even dislike Kobe. He was probably my favorite player when I was younger and I really liked his later Lakers squads (though more for Pau and Bynum at that point). You can make the argument that he's somehow more of a team builder than Lebron (though I'm not sure I buy that) because that's basically entirely subjective. But it's hard to ignore that he had a tendency to hero ball it without the results to back up that mentality.
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,040
19,503
Still waiting on anything to back up the idea that Kobe is clutch. I used to think that until I saw the numbers and I don't know how else you could measure it if not by numbers. If you don't believe in any quantifiable way to measure it or that all the numbers from that link don't matter then, yeah, I guess it is all about feels.

You can point out Lebron played against a weaker conference for many of those playoff games but that still doesn't mean Kobe's numbers aren't pretty poor. I'm sure there's some way to quantify that, as well, but that's just another number and not a feeling.

I don't even dislike Kobe. He was probably my favorite player when I was younger and I really liked his later Lakers squads (though more for Pauand Bynumat that point). You can make the argument that he's somehow more of a team builder than Lebron (though I'm not sure I buy that) because that's basically entirely subjective. But it's hard to ignore that he had a tendency to hero ball it without the results to back up that mentality.
lol You had me going for a minute there
 

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,387
15,530
lol You had me going for a minute there
Bynum was a really good center, offensively and defensively, for about 4-5 years. Do you disagree with that? Don't just remember his silly antics toward the end. They don't win those championships without him, imo.
 

Gilgamel

A Man Chooses....
2,869
52
Bynum was a really good center, offensively and defensively, for about 4-5 years. Do you disagree with that? Don't just remember his silly antics toward the end. They don't win those championships without him, imo.
Lies. It was Kobe and a similar supporting cast to the ones Lebron has drug to the finals every non-Miami year. Kobe's just better in the clutch so he won with those teams sometimes!
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,040
19,503
Bynum was a really good center, offensively and defensively, for about 4-5 years. Do you disagree with that? Don't just remember his silly antics toward the end. They don't win those championships without him, imo.
He was a good center when the NBA lacked any good centers so he looked alot better by comparison. He was also wildly inconsistent and they still win in '09 without him
 

Blitz

<Bronze Donator>
5,929
6,556
Bynum/Gasol were solid players, but I honestly believe the Lakers benefited from playing a Magic team in the finals that were not that great, and from a referee onslaught in Game 7 of the '10 Finals. Now obviously, I'd rather have those two guys than not, but I think even Kobe benefited from some good circumstances (which all champions do).

To touch on your "clutch statistics", you can even get deeper with those analytics. I'd be really curious to see how many of those points/shots/whatever come from garbage time points where LeBron's team is being blown-out deep in the game etc... The stats aren't all that surprising, generally "clutch" is a by product of winning. Basketball is extremely situational, those surveys of some of basketball's best minds unanimously taking Kobe in the clutch speak to how situational the sport is.
 

Blitz

<Bronze Donator>
5,929
6,556
On another note, I was completely sold on the idea of letting Love walk and taking Thompson & Mozgov in place of the Love money. Talks now that Thompson wants $15 /yr makes that situation more interesting though.
 

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,387
15,530
I'd be really curious to see how many of those points/shots/whatever come from garbage time points where LeBron's team is being blown-out deep in the game etc...
The first section was shots to tie or take a lead so no garbage time situations.

On another note, I was completely sold on the idea of letting Love walk and taking Thompson & Mozgov in place of the Love money. Talks now that Thompson wants $15 /yr makes that situation more interesting though.
I don't know how they could take Thompson at 15/year over Love. At the very least they could flip a long-term contract Love for a better player than Thompson if they don't feel it's working out.
 

popsicledeath

Potato del Grande
7,547
11,831
Game 7 of a Playoff Series

Kobe 22.2ppg on 38.9% FG with 8.0rpg and 5.0apg (6 games)

LeBron *34.0ppg on 46.5% FG with 8.1rpg and 3.5 APG (4 games) (*NBA Record)
Kobe is 5-1 in game 7's, the only loss being the Suns series that was lol-worthy he even carried that team to a game 7.

Lebron is 3-2, which isn't bad, but his only wins on the stacked Heat teams that somehow got pushed to 3 game 7's in 2 years.

Would Kobe have won his only loss with another Hall of Famer in Wade and solid All-Star like Bosh on the team? Instead of Lamar Odom, umm, Kwame Brown... well, there was Smush Parker.... Shit, it's hard to even find other players on the roster worth mentioning.

Would Lebron have ever won a game 7 without Wade and Bosh? At this point, we'll never know, because Lebron never has.

Of course, people forget how shitty many Kobe teams were, and how relatively weak even his second batch of championship teams were. Why? Because he was winning! We say, yeah, but he had good teams, obviously, because they were winning teams.

Of course, Lebron is given a pass for his Cavs teams being 'terrible' because, well, he was losing. He didn't win, so obviously the other players on his team weren't very good and were all losers, right, otherwise they would be winning!

That's why given the exact same roster, same coach, same management, same everyone except my pick between Lebron or Kobe to lean the team, I pick Kobe every time. Because Kobe is a winner, and Lebron is a loser.

Of course, I have no doubt Lebron would have the better stats in that scenario... and still lose more, and his teammates have worse stats, play worse, with worse attitudes and worse effort and worse desire to win.

And I have no doubt even in losing Lebron would tell a press conference he's the player in the world, and Kobe would laugh because he'd know he just beat the so-called best player in the world yet again.
 

popsicledeath

Potato del Grande
7,547
11,831
After looking at Bynum's game logs/per game stats in the '10 title run, aside from a 21 pt & 7 BLK game in a losing effort, his post season stats are surprisingly underwhelming. Thought he did a little more than this. Averaged 7.4 points & 5.1 reb in the Celtics series.

Andrew Bynum Game By Game Stats and Performance - ESPN
Andrew Bynum was shit. Shit stats. Shit effort. Shit attitude. Which is part of the reason Kobe used to skewer him and helped push his ass out of the organization.

Hell, even Pau was pretty soft. He'd at least respond when Kobe rode his ass, though.

And I'm sorry that even if the deflection of any criticism of Lebron we have to talk about how other players are winners as Lebron has found himself losing once again.
 

popsicledeath

Potato del Grande
7,547
11,831
I think even Kobe benefited from some good circumstances (which all champions do).
Sucks that Lebron benefits more than any player I've ever seen, and is still a perennial loser when he doesn't have his Hall of Fame and All-Star buddies helping him win as a hired gun in Miami.

Lebron in press conference saying he'd rather not make the playoffs at all than lose in the finals. Even baited into a response by a dumb question, could anyone imagine MJ or Kobe or Magic or Bird or ANY respectable championship caliber player ever saying they were the best in the world, then lose the finals at home, and THEN say it hurts losing so they'd rather not make the playoffs than lose in the finals?!
 

popsicledeath

Potato del Grande
7,547
11,831
I'd like to see some statistics on Finals game 7's for MJ and how many times MJ admitted he'd have rather not made the playoffs than be subjected to another losing effort.
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
Nobody said Kobe is better. If fact, you seething fucking retard
Blitz_sl said:
LeBron will go down as a better player as Kobe, but like Shaq said, it'd be hard to take him over a guy like Kobe when the game is winding down.
popsicledeath_sl said:
I'd take Kobe over Lebron every time while building a team and down the stretch of any game that mattered.
Commander Vimesh_sl said:
I'm heavily in the rings trump all camp as any good bulls fan should be.
Thanks for calling me a retard though!
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
Listen pops, I'm totally fine with just settling on a agree to disagree for your opinions on LeBron. The Kobe discussion was simply a tangent that has come up a lot based around the idea of him being "clutch" which you can see you aren't the only one that holds that opinion of him. I think the stats say Kobe has just taken a ton of clutch time shots, not that he has made them at any sort of amazing clip.

I care about stats and only stats because ultimately it's my opinion that talent trumps everything. I don't care about a player's attitude or desire or a draft prospects NCAA tournament performance or workout scouting. Basketball analytics are by no means perfect but they go a long way to allow you realize things about players you might not see and I'll trust that over any random person's eye test.

You need a top player to win a championship and you have to surround that player with a deep team. Kobe had that for all 5 of his championships (3 to a much larger degree than the last 2 admittedly). LeBron had that in Miami. He hasn't on any of his Cavs teams. I'll give him a ton of flack for his performance against the Mavs in Maimi which you might as well call a choke job. I do not feel the same about the loss to the Spurs, where he played amazing but hit a juggernaut of a playoff team.

Ultimately it's a difference of opinion. It's fine if you think Bron is a loser because he lacks the qualities of a champion or whatever. I'm still going to think that logic is pretty flawed as it isn't something that can be quantified at all (and the end result, because it can't be quantified is you just thinking you're absolute in your opinion in the face of evidence otherwise). I think basketball is a team game and championships are won on talent and in the rare situation that a winning team can be explained in some other manner, well, I just think those are outliers.

Edit: I don't even like LeBron. I was very happy to watch him lose. I can just acknowledge how good he is.